翻訳と辞書 |
R (British Sky Broadcasting Ltd) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis : ウィキペディア英語版 | R (British Sky Broadcasting Ltd) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis
''R (British Sky Broadcasting Ltd) v Central Criminal Court'' () UKSC 17 was a 2014 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. The court held that as ''inter partes'' proceedings created a ''lis'' between the parties (per ''Lewes''), equal treatment (per ''Al Rawi'') meant that ''ex parte'' evidence in general could not be adduced. ==Facts== Two army officers, B and D had been passing information from the COBRA committee to British Sky Broadcasting Ltd (B Sky B) in the person of Sam Kiley. The Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police (the Commissioner) had made an ''inter partes'' application for a production order, to the circuit judge. Certain evidence was offered ''ex parte'' over the objections of B Sky B. The judge granted the order, and B Sky B applied to the Administrative Court for a judicial review. The Administrative Court quashed the production order (() EWHC 3451 (Admin)). Proceedings against the officers were dropped, but because of the importance of the legal argument, the Commissioner appealed.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「R (British Sky Broadcasting Ltd) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|